ICIMEE-25 Paper Review Process and Criteria

The ICIMEE-25 conference emphasizes a rigorous and structured review process to ensure the quality and relevance of submissions.

Below are the detailed aspects of the review process:

1.Original Research Contributions

  • Submissions must be original and present new findings or methodologies.
  • The research work should not have been published elsewhere or be under review in other venues.
  • This ensures the conference showcases groundbreaking advancements in materials innovation, mechanical engineering, and sustainable energy.

2. Alignment with Conference

Papers must align with ICIMEE-25’s core themes, including:

  • Materials Innovation
  • Energy Engineering
  • Submissions should bridge theoretical knowledge with practical applications, reflecting the conference’s interdisciplinary nature.

3. Formatting and Structural Compliance

Authors must strictly adhere to the prescribed formatting guidelines, which include:

  • Use of the official template provided by the conference.
  • Standardized citation styles (e.g., IEEE, APA).

Mandatory sections such as:

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Introduction
  • Methodology
  • Results and Discussion
  • Conclusion

Non-compliance may result in rejection at the initial screening stage.

4. Rigorous Peer Review

Each submission is evaluated by a panel of subject-matter experts.

Reviewers assess the following key aspects:
  • Clarity of Writing: Is the paper clearly articulated and easy to follow?
  • Robustness of Methodology: Are the research methods well-designed and reliable?
  • Validity of Results: Are the findings credible and supported by evidence?
  • Contribution to the Field: Does the paper add significant value or present novel insights?

Submissions with more than 20% plagiarism (as detected by plagiarism-checking tools) will be rejected outright.

5. Plagiarism Policy

  • A strict plagiarism policy is enforced to ensure academic integrity.
  • The similarity index for each paper must not exceed 20% as determined by tools such as Turnitin or iThenticate.
  • Any instance of self-plagiarism or unethical borrowing of content will lead to rejection.

Click here to Know more about Plagiarism

6. Revision and Improvement

Authors may receive constructive feedback from reviewers, addressing areas such as:

  • Weaknesses in methodology or analysis.
  • Lack of clarity or structural inconsistencies.
  • Enhancements in scientific rigor and presentation.
  • Authors must revise their submissions thoroughly to address these comments.
  • The acceptance of a paper is contingent upon the success of the revisions made.

By adhering to these criteria, ICIMEE-25 ensures that accepted papers are of the highest quality, contributing significantly to the advancement of materials, mechanical engineering, and sustainable energy solutions.

 

  • Submissions must be original and present new findings or methodologies.
  • The research work should not have been published elsewhere or be under review in other venues.
  • This ensures the conference showcases groundbreaking advancements in materials innovation, mechanical engineering, and sustainable energy.
Scroll to Top